Title:<\/strong>\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em><\/p>\n ISSN<\/strong>:\u00a01361-4533 (print),\u00a0<\/span>1740-7834 (online)<\/span><\/p>\n Website:<\/strong>\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em> | Current Issue<\/a><\/p>\n Purpose, objective, or mission:\u00a0<\/strong>The\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em>\u00a0is an international journal that works to establish \u201cthe relevance and applicability of theory and\/or research for the academic library practitioner.\u201d The journal\u2019s intent is \u201cdisseminate developments and encourage discussion on the future role of academic libraries and their services.\u201d1<\/sup><\/p>\n Target audience:<\/strong>\u00a0The target audience is academic librarians and information professionals from around the world.2<\/sup><\/p>\n Publisher:<\/strong>\u00a0Taylor & Francis.3<\/sup><\/p>\n Peer reviewed?<\/strong>\u00a0Yes.4<\/sup><\/p>\n Type:<\/strong>\u00a0LIS scholarly journal.<\/p>\n Medium:<\/strong>\u00a0Print and online.5<\/sup><\/p>\n Content:<\/strong>\u00a0T<\/em>he New Review of Academic Librarianship\u00a0<\/i>publishes a comprehensive range of topics in the realm of academic libraries and their services, including scholarly communication and institutional repositories, learning and research support, information literacy, technological advances, physical space, monitoring and evaluation, collection management, conservation and preservation, collaboration, electronic content, and national and international higher education library policy.6<\/sup>\u00a0The journal regularly publishes special issues; past themes include Supporting Researchers: Sustainable Innovation in Strategy and Services7<\/sup>\u00a0and\u00a0Librarian as Communicator.8<\/sup><\/p>\n Frequency of publication:<\/strong>\u00a0Four times per year.9<\/sup><\/p>\n Location of submission guidelines:<\/strong>\u00a0Instructions for authors<\/a><\/p>\n Types of contributions accepted:<\/strong> Original research articles, literature review articles,\u00a0and scholarly perspectives \u201cbased on theory and research that advance the understanding of the development of high quality academic library and information management practices.\u201d10<\/sup><\/p>\n Submission and review process:<\/strong>\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/i>\u00a0uses ScholarOne Manuscripts for submissions.11<\/sup>\u00a0Manuscripts undergo editorial screening and anonymous peer review.12<\/sup>\u00a0Taylor & Francis provides a website for authors that gives an overview of the publishing process and help with submitting manuscripts.13<\/sup><\/p>\n Editorial tone:<\/strong>\u00a0The tone of the writing in the\u00a0New Review<\/em>\u00a0of Academic Librarianship<\/em>\u00a0is academic yet less formal than one might expect in a scholarly journal. Since the journal is intended for an international readership, authors are instructed to adopt \u201ca straightforward writing style\u2026avoiding over-long or complex sentence structures.\u201d14<\/sup><\/p>\n Style guide used:<\/strong>\u00a0APA (6th edition); Taylor & Francis provides a reference guide as well.15<\/sup><\/p>\n The\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em>\u00a0is a prestigious LIS journal with an international scope and a focus on research and practice in academic libraries. Submissions reflect advanced and original research and high-level scholarship. LIS authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that \u201csignificantly contribute to the knowledge base of academic librarians.\u201d Futhermore, the journal welcomes perspectives \u201cfrom academic library practitioners, educationalists involved with academic libraries and others with relevant knowledge and interest.\u201d16<\/sup><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Publication circulation:<\/strong>\u00a0Data not available.<\/p>\n Audience location and language or cultural considerations:<\/strong>\u00a0Although published in the United Kingdom, the\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em>\u00a0is intended for an international readership, including both English-speaking and non-English-speaking countries, especially in Europe. The journal is published in English; however, given its intended international audience, the publishers stress the importance of using a straightforward writing style.17<\/sup><\/p>\n Reader characteristics:<\/strong>\u00a0The readers targeted are most likely librarians and information specialists associated with colleges and universities. While the specific practices at institutions of higher education may differ in the various nations where the journal is read, the librarians are most likely highly educated individuals providing educational and research support for faculty and students.<\/p>\n Knowledge of LIS subject matter:<\/strong>\u00a0It is safe to assume that the readers of this journal are well versed in LIS issues. However, an author should remember that the readers are academic librarians and will not necessarily be familiar with the details or practices of other types of libraries. Furthermore, an author writing for the\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship\u00a0<\/em>should consider that the experiences of academic librarians in other countries might differ significantly from those in their own countries, and so provide some context and explanation.<\/p>\n Authors submitting to the\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship<\/em>\u00a0should understand that the readership is international in scope and focused on theory and practice in academic libraries and information services targeted to faculty and students in colleges and universities. They should keep in mind regional and cultural considerations that may need to be explicated for readers from different regions. The readership expects high-level scholarship and research, as well as analyses that emphasize how LIS scholarship can be implemented in practices and services in academic libraries.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Last updated:<\/strong>\u00a0February 10, 2018<\/p>\n Publication analysis About the publication Title:\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship ISSN:\u00a01361-4533 (print),\u00a01740-7834 (online) Website:\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship | Current Issue Purpose, objective, or mission:\u00a0The\u00a0New Review of Academic Librarianship\u00a0is an international journal that works to establish \u201cthe relevance and applicability of theory and\/or research for the academic library practitioner.\u201d The journal\u2019s intent is \u201cdisseminate developments […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":772,"featured_media":0,"parent":2013,"menu_order":31,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-2206","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/772"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2206"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2206\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3436,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2206\/revisions\/3436"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/infosci\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}About the publication\u2019s submission guidelines<\/h3>\n
Conclusion: Evaluation of publication\u2019s potential for LIS authors<\/h3>\n
Audience analysis<\/h2>\n
\nAbout the publication\u2019s readers<\/h3>\n
Conclusion: Analysis of reader characteristics and their potential impact on authors<\/h3>\n
\nReferences<\/h4>\n
\n