324 Main Library | 1408 West Gregory Drive | Urbana IL 61801 | 217-333-1777 | ihlc@library.illinois.edu
Browse by: Collection Titles Subjects Persons or Organizations
Please note: For the fall 2021 semester, IHLC will be open for walk-ins during weekday afternoons, 1-5pm, and otherwise by appointment only. In-person appointments are limited, but we continue to be able to fulfill digitization requests for remote access. Please email us at ihlc@library.illinois.edu for more information about the process for making an appointment or making a digitization request.

Johnson v. Board of Education of Champaign (Unit 4) Records

Overview

Scope and Contents

Subject Terms

PDF Box/Folder List

Finding Aid for Johnson v. Board of Education of Champaign (Unit 4) Records, 1991-2009 | Illinois History and Lincoln Collections

RequestSubmit request (Aeon) | Printer-friendly Printer-friendly | Email Us Contact Us About This Collection

Collection Overview

Title: Johnson v. Board of Education of Champaign (Unit 4) Records, 1991-2009

Predominant Dates:2000-2008

Extent: 11.0 cubic feet

Subjects: Champaign County (Ill.), Champaign County--Champaign (Ill.), Champaign County--Urbana (Ill.), Courts, Education, Law, Race, School districts

Forms of Material: Legal records

Scope and Contents of the Materials

This collection is comprised of records from the Johnson v. Board of Education of Champaign (Unit 4) court case (No. 00-1349). The Plaintiffs sought to eliminate "unwarranted disparities" between African-American and white students within the Unit 4 School District. The Unit 4 district, which includes all public schools within Champaign (Ill.), operated under a court decree from 2002 to 2009. Records include reports, motions, court orders, correspondence, minutes, audits, and other materials.

In 1996, Felicia Johnson, the mother of two African-American students in Unit 4 schools, filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights regarding discrepancies in transportation and educational services for African-American students compared with those for other students in the district. The complaint was later amended to include additional allegations of discrimination and segregation within the school district. Unit 4 entered into an agreement in 1998 to resolve the issues. The Board then brought in Dr. Robert Peterkin and James Lucey to conduct a comprehensive educational equity audit to evaluate the district and determine which areas needed improvement.

The complaint escalated to a lawsuit in 2000, and on January 29, 2002, the Board of Education signed the Second Revised Consent Decree, which required the district to eliminate racial inequality in attendance and enrollment, special education, gifted and talented programs, hiring of staff, discipline, student achievement, graduation, and other areas. Unit 4 operated under the consent decree from 2002 to November 4, 2009, when both parties signed a settlement agreement officially ending the decree.

This collection is comprised of three series: Committee Documents, Legal Case and Court Documents, and Assessment Reports.

The Committee Documents series (Series 1) contains materials produced by the various committees formed under the Unit 4 District in order to eliminate inequality and implement change for Champaign schools. The committees generated records such as minutes, correspondence, project notes, policies, and plans to examine and discuss all aspects of the case. The Planning and Implementation Committee (PIC) consisted of representatives from the African-American community as well as the school district administration. It was developed in order to "monitor and evaluate the development and implementation of the Controlled Choice and Educational Equity Plans" and documents the process of defining and solving the problems facing the Champaign school district prior to and during the decree. Topics discussed by the PIC include placing Resource Officers in schools as well as improving the special education programs throughout the district. The Level III Task Force, also comprised of community and administrative representation, evaluated the disparities within upper-level and Advanced Placement programs. They focused on refining Level III course policies, as well as providing resources for both students and teachers in order to encourage higher-level learning in both middle schools and high schools. The Unit 4 Board of Education minutes document discussion about staff hiring processes, student discipline, facility issues and costs, as well as the progression and implementation of the Consent Decree plans.

The Legal Case and Court Documents series (Series 2) contains official documents submitted to the court throughout the entirety of the case. Documents such as requests, minutes, affidavits, and correspondence included under complaints provide insight into the Plaintiffs' charges leading up to the 2002 Proposed Revised Consent Decree. Pleadings offer a glimpse into the legal progression of the case and include a variety of documents filed in the lawsuit. Documents included in the pleadings consist of motions, complaints, transcripts, orders, correspondence, affidavits, reports, and other materials. This series also includes the 1998 Educational Equity Audit, which determined the areas that needed improvement throughout the Unit 4 district, including discipline, graduation rates, attendance, staffing, special education programs, and Level III courses.

The Assessment Reports series (Series 3) consists of two types of reports, Monitoring Reports and District Quarterly Reports. Monitoring Reports were created by Dr. Robert Peterkin, the appointed Court Monitor, and James Lucey, an independent consultant, to document the progress of the Unit 4 School District under the Consent Decree. These reports were submitted to Judge Joe B. McDade and include graphs and data reviewing the progress of the district in areas such as information technology, discipline, Controlled Choice, and other areas. This series also includes District Quarterly Reports that departments within the district itself generated and submitted to the Court Monitor for review. These reports reviewed the same areas as the Monitoring Reports, but they offer an in-depth look at the statistics per quarter and/or per school year.

The Library acquired this collection from Carol Ashley in 2012 and 2013. Ashley was one of the attorneys at the Chicago-based law firm Futterman & Howard that represented the Plaintiffs during the case.

Subject/Index Terms

Champaign County (Ill.)
Champaign County--Champaign (Ill.)
Champaign County--Urbana (Ill.)
Courts
Education
Law
Race
School districts

Administrative Information

Repository: Illinois History and Lincoln Collections

Box/Folder List

URL: http://www.library.illinois.edu/ihx/inventories/johnson-v-champaignunit4.pdf

PDF finding aid for Johnson v. Board of Education of Champaign (Unit 4) Records


Page Generated in: 0.098 seconds (using 51 queries).
Using 5.68MB of memory. (Peak of 6.02MB.)

Powered by Archon Version 3.21 rev-3
Copyright (c) The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign