{"id":160,"date":"2017-05-08T14:20:55","date_gmt":"2017-05-08T14:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/?page_id=160"},"modified":"2017-05-08T14:28:22","modified_gmt":"2017-05-08T14:28:22","slug":"field_guide_statistics","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/fieldguides\/field_guide_statistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Field Guide Statistics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When the International Field Guides <a title=\"database\" href=\"http:\/\/bibleaves.library.illinois.edu\/catalog?f[collection_facet][]=fldg\">database<\/a> reached 5,000 records in summer 2007, Bird field guides were the most common at 17%, although birds make up less than 1% of all known species of organisms!\u00a0 By contrast, 7% of field guides cover Insects, which make up about 60% of all species but are more difficult to identify in the field.\u00a0 The most popular plant guides were Wildflower guides (12%) followed by general Plant guides (10%).\u00a0 North American field guides made up nearly half of the database, followed by 19% European guides.\u00a0 While the classification percentages are probably fairly accurate, the regional percentages almost certainly under-represent some regions of the world, especially those that use non-Roman alphabets and\/or are not in areas actively collected by North American science libraries.<\/p>\n<h2><em>Multiple classifications:<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Flora and fauna guides: 5%<\/li>\n<li>Combined animal classifications: 53%<\/li>\n<li>Combined plant classifications: 39%<\/li>\n<li>All other guides (Miscellaneous, Rocks, Astronomy): 3%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><em>Individual classifications:<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Bird guides: 17%<\/li>\n<li>Wildflower guides: 12%<\/li>\n<li>Plants: 10%<\/li>\n<li>Insects: 7%<\/li>\n<li>Trees: 7%<\/li>\n<li>Mammals: 6%<\/li>\n<li>Fish: 6%<\/li>\n<li>Animals: 5%<\/li>\n<li>Reptiles and Amphibians: 5%<\/li>\n<li>Mushrooms: 4%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>\u00a0 <em>Regions:<\/em><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Africa 9%<\/li>\n<li>Asia 5%<\/li>\n<li>Australasia 8%<\/li>\n<li>Central and South America 7%<\/li>\n<li>Europe 19%<\/li>\n<li>Pacific Islands 2%<\/li>\n<li>North America 11%<\/li>\n<li>North America, Eastern 19%<\/li>\n<li>North America, Western 16%<\/li>\n<li>Worldwide 4%<\/li>\n<li>Other 4%<\/li>\n<li>All 3 North American regions: 46%<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Articles about Field Guides<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>Schmidt, Diane. 2006. <a title=\"Field Guides in Academe: A Citation Study\" href=\"https:\/\/www.ideals.illinois.edu\/handle\/2142\/3455\">Field Guides in Academe: A Citation Study<\/a>. Journal of Academic Librarianship 32(4):274-285.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When the International Field Guides database reached 5,000 records in summer 2007, Bird field guides were the most common at 17%, although birds make up less than 1% of all known species of organisms!\u00a0 By contrast, 7% of field guides cover Insects, which make up about 60% of all species but are more difficult to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":73,"featured_media":0,"parent":164,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-160","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/160","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/73"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=160"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/160\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":161,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/160\/revisions\/161"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/164"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wordpress.library.illinois.edu\/biology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=160"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}