From the Chair
The ICA/SUV is about to complete its four-year provisional period.
We have every expectation that the term "provisional" will be removed
from the section's name at the Beijing Congress. The section has worked
toward its goals as expressed in the by-laws: to promote communication
and cooperation between archives; to gather and disseminate information
about the creation and administration of archives and about the role of
archives in relation to their host institution and to society at large,
and about the administrative policies and procedures which they have
developed; to assist in the development and strengthening of archives;
and to cooperate with other bodies of the ICA. The section has also
developed procedures for its own governance including procedures for the
election of the section's leadership.
However, there is still much work which can be done. Our membership,
although growing, draws heavily from countries within the UNESCO
definition of Europe. Perhaps the Beijing meeting will encourage
membership from countries in Asia and Southeast Asia. Will our current
program of activities be of assistance to those archivists? Our major
activity of the past three years, the seminar, is an expensive
proposition which precludes the attendance of a majority of our members.
Can we develop another activity to provide similar opportunities for the
exchange of ideas to members who cannot attend the seminars? The
recently completed joint workshop was a wonderful chance to pool our
expertise with an international organization which shares our interests.
Can we continue to reach out to organizations which share our concerns?
It will be an exciting future for the ICA/SUV. We would like to
express our thanks to the members and all archival colleagues who have
participated during the first four years. It has been a pleasure to
work with you.
Marjorie Barritt
for the steering committee
Election Report
The results from our democratic, completely open election were in as of
April 1996. The members who had allowed their names to be put in
nomination were notified in early May. The nominating committee is
pleased with the participation of the section members, especially the
fifteen members who were willing to be nominees and the forty-five (out
of seventy-six ballots mailed) members who voted. The count was very
close and everyone on the ballot received much support from their
colleagues. The new steering committee includes four members who are
continuing their tenure on the committee and six members new to the
committee.
The officers whose terms begin in Beijing are: Patricia Methven, chair,
to serve a four-year term and Andree Despy-Meyer, secretary, to serve a
two-year term.
Steering Committee members to serve a four-year term:
- Mariza Bottino
- Christina Jonsson
- Angeles Moreno Lopez
- Frank Scheelings
- Virginia Teehan
Steering Committee members to serve a two-year term:
- Anne Barrett
- Esperanza de Varona
- Guy Dinel
- Tim Robinson
- Eero Vallisaari
We have submitted the names of the elected chair and secretary to ICA
for their official appointment. The nominating committee: Marjorie
Barritt, Didier Devriese, and Peter Harper
Summary Proceedings of the Liege meeting.
Archiving the Records of Contemporary Science
A joint meeting organised by the International Union of the History and
Philosophy of Science, Division of History of Science, Commission on
Bibliography and Documentation
and the International Council on Archives Provisional Section of
University and Research Institution Archives, Archives of Science
Subgroup.
28-29 May 1996, Liege, Belgium
ICA/SUV Programme Committee: Anne Barrett (UK), Gavan McCarthy
(Australia), Gianni Paoloni (Italy). Hosted by: Professor Robert
Halleux, Universite de Liege
Conference Statement
A meeting of archivists and historians of science in Liege discussed
issues
relating to the documentation of contemporary science and the problems
and
opportunities that have arisen in recent years in relation to records
creation and recordkeeping. These issues were examined with a
particular
reference to records in electronic systems.
Some of the key themes of the meeting were:
- to explore the changes in scientific practice brought about by
electronic communications systems and the implications of that for the
management and preservation of scientific records;
- to consider the respective responsiblilities of scientists,
archivists and historians in the selection of records to be preserved;
- to develop strategies for archivists at the organisational,
national and international levels;
- to develop strategies for impressing the importance of this
issue upon the scientific community and the organisations in which they
work.
Particular attention was paid to the differences in current
recordkeeping practices between strategic fields of research like
biotechnology and pharmaceuticals, and sciences that are far from the
market, like mathematics. The meeting emphasised the importance of
developing archival techniques that will ensure the integrity,
authenticity and credibility of records generated electronically. The
meeting expressed concern that the extent of this problem is not
adequately known and that significant further research is required to
enable the development and implementation of appropriate strategies.
The meeting recognised the importance of using the ICA, IUHPS DHS and
ICSU to bring the results of the meeting to the broader communities of
archivists, historians and scientists.
Working Groups
Working Groups were allocated prior to the conference to draft the
conference statement and develop sets of strategies for specific areas:
- Strategies for Individual Archives
- Strategies for National Scientific Communities
- Strategies for the International Science Archives Community
Working Group 1 - Strategies for Institutional Archives / Archivists
Leader: Anne Barrett (UK)
- Didier de Vriese (Belgium)
- Denise Ogilvie (France)
- Frank Scheelings (Belgium)
- Sofie de Winter (Belgium)
The strategy proposed at the institutional level is to encourage
University and other institutional archivists to investigate a number of
issues concerning recordkeeping. The model for these investigations will
be taken, in the first instance, from two French and one Australian
questionnaires that have already been implemented. The results of these
studies will be analysed by the group, and the resulting information be
fed into the national and international strategies. A document in the
form of "Guidelines for the Interviewer" will be produced and will be
published on the Internet. The purpose of the questionnaire will be to
raise awareness of the need for recordkeeping by records creators and
conversely to raise the awareness of the archivist as to the nature of
records and state of recordkeeping in their institution.
Working Group 2 - Strategies at the National Level
Leader: Gianni Paoloni (Italy)
- Andree Despy-Meyer (Belgium)
- Peter Harper (UK)
- Christina Jonsson (Sweden)
Most scientists and record managers seem to consider the problem of the
preservation of science archives as irrelevant. Archivists and
historians of contemporary science wish to draw to the attention of the
science communities to the potential dangers coming from the loss of
evidence on the research process, and to stress the importance of
documenting the process itself besides the obvious importance of
publishing and/or patenting results.
The increasing use of information technology by the scientific
communities makes the problem of science archives more urgent. Although
there is no consensus at present on standards for the preservation,
validation and appraisal of the records produced by new electronic
procedures, that is not an excuse for inaction. Archivists themselves
have a responsibility for developing a study of records produced by the
changing ways of scientific activity.
Science is an international endeavour, and key issues such as the
possible loss of the memory of the scientific research work need to have
an international framework. Nevertheless, problems in science archives
will be dealt with mainly at the national level.
Appropriate institutions, according to the varying administrative
organisation and traditions of different countries, should be encouraged
to undertake national surveys on science archives with particular
reference to the use of research networks and electronic record keeping
(both administrative and technical) in the context of scientific
activity.
Universities, learned societies, academies, discipline-based
professional associations and other scientific organisations may be of
great help in promoting projects (involving a wide range of archival,
historical, scientific, and technological expertise) on the preservation
and usage of records in major scientific institutions and research
centers, both university and non-university based. The relationship
between electronic and non-electronic records, whether they be
administrative records, policy records, scientific and technical
records, data and scientific evidence, should be investigated. It is
expected that this investigation will demonstrate that documenting the
research process has significant value for the institutions's economic
management, research policy strategies and decision making, and not just
for the historical dimension.
These projects would also provide the intellectual and practical basis
for the determination of appropriate standards for science archives, in
all media, both in respect of preservation and planned disposal. These
projects might lead wherever possible to the establishment of a national
coordinating body or national information and reference organisation.
All institutions and individuals owning or having custody of scientific
archives should be encouraged to cooperate with this body.
Working Group 3 - Strategies at the International Level
Leader: Joan Warnow-Blewett (USA)
- Finn Aaserud (Denmark)
- Ginette Gablot (France)
- Philip Kent (Australia)
- Carmelia Opsomer (Belgium)
Our targets on the international level are historians and archivists of
modern science. To help us reach our targets we propose to use the
parent organisations of this conference: The Division for the History of
Science (especially its Commission on Bibliography and Documentation )
and The International Council on Archives (especially the science
subgroup of its SUV section).
We ask:
(1) That the Australian Science Archives Project extend its STAMA
listserve and World Wide Web homepage to include the DHS Commission as
well as the ICA/SUV section.
(2) That information be gathered and disseminated regarding:
- newsletters, websites, etc on history of science groups,
- disciplinary history groups, relevant archival groups, electronics records groups;
- scientific documentation projects and programmes;
- guides to archival collections, including national
- guides,disciplinary guides and relevant repository guides.
Longer Term Effort
To encourage national committies of DHS to initiate national efforts to
collect information on papers of scientists in repositories and then to
help secure papers now outside of repositiories/depositories - the goal
is to have ongoing programmes.
Steps:
- gather information on existing national programmes - Joan
Warnow Blewett will coordinate this knowledge as she is informed by
individuals and report on the STAMA listserve with names and addresses
of contacts;
- send etters and other communications to DHS national
committees;
- encourage national committees to put out descriptions of
specific collections.
Working Group 4 - The Conference Statement
Leader: Gavan McCarthy (Australia)
- Rod Home (Australia)
- John Krige (France)
- Patricia Radelet (Belgium)
- Julia Sheppard (UK)
- Odile Welfele-Capy (France)
The above summary was delivered by Gavan McCarthy and Anne Barrett to
the ICA office in Paris immediately after the conference ended, which as
Gavan reports "made a great impression in many quarters having the
summary proceedings available so quickly after the meeting."
Steering Committee of the Section on University and Research Institution
Archives Term begins September 1996
Anne Barrett
Rm 455 Sherfield Building
Imperial College London
London SW7 2AZ UK
Ph: 44 171 594 8850
Fax: 44 171 594 9353
E-mail: a.barrett@ic.ac.uk
Mariza Bottino
Universidade do Rio de Janeiro (UNI RIO)
Arquivo Central
Rua Alfredo do Pnto 25/702
Tijuca RJ 20520-000
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Ph: 55 21 264 9068
Fax: 55 21 233 7142
Andree Despy-Meyer, secretary
University Libre de Bruxelles
50, av. Franklin Roosevelt
1050 Bruxelles, CP 1700, Belgium
Tel: 32 2 650 2443
Fax: 32 2 650 3567
E-mail: c/o
Guy Dinel
University Laval
Division des Archives
Pavillon Bonenfant Bureau 5470
Cite Universitaire, Sainte-Foy G1K7PA
Quebec, Canada
Ph: 418 656 3928
Fax: 418 656 3826
Email: Guy.Dinel@sg.ulaval.ca
Esperanza de Varona
University of Miami
Archives & Special Collections
P.O. Box 248214
Coral Gables, Fl, 33124, U.S.A.
Tel: 305 284-3247
Fax: 305 665-7352
E-mail: Edevaron@umiami.ir.miami.edu
Christina Jonsson
KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Central administration
JUE, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Ph: 468 790 7990
Fax: 468 790 9005
E-mail: chris@admin.kth.se
Patricia Methven, chair
King's College London Archives
Strand, London
WC2R 2LS UK
Ph: 44 71 873 2760
E-mail: P.METHVEN@Kcl.ac.uk
Angeles Moreno
Universidad de Valladolid
Archivo Universitario
Edificio Alfonso VIII
Calle Real de Burgos, s/n
47011 Valladolid, Spain
Ph: 34 83 42 3000
Fax: 34 83 42 3030
E-mail: moreno@cpd.uva.es
Tim Robinson
Archives A14
University of Sydney
NSW 2006, Australia
Ph: 61 2 9351 4263
Fax: 61 2 9351 7304
E-mail: TIM@server1.archives.su.oz.au
Frank Scheelings
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Universiteitsarchief
sB 112, Pleinlaan 2
1050 Brussel, Belgium
Ph: 32 2 629 2434
Fax: 32 2 629 2693
E-mail: fscheeli@vnet3.vub.ac.be
Virginia Teehan
University College Cork
Cork, Ireland
Ph: 353 21 276871
Fax: 353 21 275948
Eero Vallisaari
University of Helsinki
P.O. Box 3 (Fabianinkatu 33)
FIN-00014 University of Helsinki
Finland
Ph: 358 9 1912 2225
Fax: 358 9 1912 3008
E-mail: eero.vallisaari@helsinki.fi
Prepared by Tim Robinson July 1996