Library Faculty Review Committee Summary
October 16, 2001
|Annual Faculty Reviews||Ö||FRC||But doesn't review "contributions to the mission of the unit"|
|3Y||Ö||Library policy is to do 3Y reviews IN ADDITION to annual reviews|
|Hired within year||Ö|
|1. Statement of Mission|
|Statement of Mission||Ö|
|Expectations of faculty||Ö||"Library" or "Unit"?||unit goals need to reflect consultative
process; include short- and long-term strategies
|2. Faculty documentation|
|B. goals||Ö||Individual + unit head||Need goal-setting training or sessions; Use train the trainers format from ARL
training last year
Also how will feedback on the goal-writing be accomplished? NOT FRC's role
|3. Roles defined||Ö||In Bylaws|
|4. Option for periodic broader review||Ö||FRC||Use Visiting Committee structure to elicit comments from external reviewers, committee chairs, supervisors, etc.???|
||Ö For untenured faculty only, through the Visiting Committee||Ö Not for tenured faculty; those not on tenure track||FRC, "supervisors"?||Move from 3 to 4 levels of groupings?
Report actual scores?
Evaluation sheets with brief comments where appropriate?
Use VC format for ALL annual evaluations?
|6. Record Keeping|
|Annual reports kept on file||Ö|
|Written feedback kept on file||Ö|
|Written response from faculty member||Ö|
|Grievance||Ö FRC reviews scores for consistency, appeals go to EC||Ö||University Librarian and By-Laws Committee||Drafting document to present to faculty; will discuss at future faculty meeting|
|Guidelines for review of the faculty review system||Ö||University Librarian|