Nature magazine has some tough questions to answer after it let its Wikipedia fetish get the better of its responsibilities to reporting science. The Encyclopedia Britannica has published a devastating response to Nature's December comparison of Wikipedia and Britannica, and accuses the journal of misrepresenting its own evidence. BookTradeInfo 3/23/06 More in The Register. See also Brittanica's response.
Posted by P. Kaufman at March 23, 2006 3:02 PM