« Book on Homosexuality in Antiquity and Essay on Pederasty Will Be Printed After All, Publisher Says | Main | Delivering on the Promise of Digital Data »
The first large-scale comparison of open-access journals with traditional ones reveals an industry in flux. While traditional journals are doing better financially, publications in both categories are contemplating changes in their business models, according to a study published on Tuesday. The study was published in book form as The Facts About Open Access by the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. The association financed the research with three other organizations, all of which are affiliated with traditional journals. The comparison was based on a survey of nearly 500 journals, and the results were first reported in March. "It's too early to tell whether full open access is a viable business model," said Cara S. Kaufman, who conducted the survey and is a principal at the Kaufman-Wills Group, publishing consultants in Baltimore. She found that more subscription-access journals break even or produce surpluses than do open-access journals. She also learned that more than half of all journals, whether traditional or openly accessible, were considering changing their business models within three years. (That rule had one exception: Only one-third of journals put out by members of the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers were planning a change.) And in what may be the report's most surprising finding, Ms. Kaufman discovered that a larger fraction of traditional journals than open-access journals charge authors fees to publish. Because the most visible publishers in the open-access movement, the Public Library of Science and BioMed Central, charge authors fees, the movement itself has often been associated with that business model. Chronicle of Higher Education 10/12/05 http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/10/2005101204n.htm Full text (overview is free) at http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub11.htm
Posted by P. Kaufman at October 12, 2005 7:28 AM