THE ISSUES

THE RESPONSE

LINKS


ISSUES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION:
News for the University of Illinois Community

« UK losing £1.5 billion due to limited access to research outputs: university prof | Main | Authors Group Sues Google »

September 20, 2005

Peer-Review Researchers Explore Hyped Conclusions, Open Access, and Bias

Several presentations suggesting improvements in peer review and publishing were given recently at the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. One group of researchers reported that industry financing of certain medical review papers is associated with hyped conclusions. Other presentations included a small journal's experience that supports the claims of open-access advocates, and data suggesting that hiding authors' identities can reduce bias in peer review of their submissions. Chronicle of higher Education 9/19/05 http://chronicle.com/daily/2005/09/2005091905n.htm

Posted by P. Kaufman at September 20, 2005 7:46 AM